California Incident Practice Tool Compliant with California SR-1 Reporting & Evidence Organization Standards

Auto Accident Evidence Dossier & Consultation Planner

Organize a structured timeline of collision facts, tally documented expenses, identify missing critical records, and generate tailored questions before speaking with an attorney or insurance adjuster.

Evidence Synthesis & Readiness Audit

Incident on Feb 14, 2025 • Rear-end collision
Documented Losses
$14,840
Medical: $9,200 • Repairs: $4,140
Evidence Completeness
78%
6 of 8 vital items secured
CA Statutory Alert
DMV SR-1 Form Required
Required if damage > $1,000 or any injury
Consultation Readiness & Document Audit 78% Complete

Chronological Incident Log

5 Events Recorded

Tailored Consultation Questions

Specific questions generated from your checked circumstances to ask during initial legal consultations.

Attorney-Ready
Dossier compiled successfully. Data stored locally on this machine.

California SR-1 Requirement

Under California Vehicle Code §16000, drivers involved in an accident with property damage exceeding $1,000, or resulting in injury or death, must file an SR-1 form with the DMV within 10 days, regardless of who was at fault.

Comparative Fault (Proposition 51)

California operates under pure comparative negligence. Even if you are determined to bear partial responsibility for an incident, you may still recover damages proportionally reduced by your percentage of fault.

Recorded Statements Caution

You are required to cooperate with your own insurer, but you generally have no legal obligation to provide a recorded statement to the adverse driver's adjuster before seeking independent legal guidance.

Checklist predicates and a saved loss ledger

Read the explanation

This dossier builder computes readiness from eight equal boolean checks. It counts the passing checks, divides by eight, multiplies by one hundred and rounds. An illustrative eight of eight gives one hundred percent. Seven of eight gives eighty seven point five, displayed as eighty eight. Six of eight gives seventy five. The bars use forty pixels per passing check, so their lengths are three hundred twenty, two hundred eighty and two hundred forty. These examples teach the formula rather than claiming an observed default result. A checklist percentage does not verify a document, diagnose an injury or establish legal preparedness. The underlying predicates must be examined separately. Several checks examine text or selected flags, not external evidence. The medical-themed check looks for words such as clinic or doctor in an event title and description. Despite its comment, it does not compare the event time to a seventy two hour interval. The image-themed check can pass when the witnesses flag is true, even without an uploaded image. A filing-themed item can pass merely because an incident date exists under its source branch. This narration does not validate the legal statements attached to those labels. The diagram shows one text field feeding a substring predicate and then one boolean. Treat that result as software state requiring source review, not proof that the named action actually happened. The six saved loss amounts are one thousand four hundred fifty, four thousand eight hundred, twelve hundred, four thousand one hundred forty, seven hundred fifty and two thousand five hundred. Adding them gives fourteen thousand eight hundred forty. The six colored segments use point zero two five pixels per currency unit and together span three hundred seventy one pixels. These values are entered ledger numbers, not independently checked receipts or a settlement estimate. The JSON backup records the supplied state. The export listener serializes state directly; generated consultation questions are not included in that JSON backup. Verify native entry, reset, exports and responsive placement separately. The source case narrative, legal claims and medical facts remain unverified.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super