Read the explanation
This saved timeline dossier is a synthetic organizational example, not a verified accident, medical record or legal recommendation. The default fixture has seven events, from March fourteenth to April tenth, a twenty-seven-day span. Its canvas maps date offsets along a usable horizontal width: x equals sixty plus elapsed days divided by the greater of the total span and five days, times width minus one hundred twenty. In our illustrative seven-hundred-twenty-pixel canvas, the usable width is six hundred. The dates at offsets zero, four, eight, fifteen and twenty-seven therefore sit at x sixty, one hundred forty-eight point nine, two hundred thirty-seven point eight, three hundred ninety-three point three and six hundred sixty. The first three events share the same date and horizontal position; alternating above and below does not separate all their labels. Filtering changes the set and recalculates its first date and span. A single event is centered. The animated point here moves from offset four to eight using that exact scale. It illustrates date placement, not evidence continuity or fault. The five fixture expenses are eight thousand four hundred twenty, two thousand one hundred fifty, three thousand six hundred, three thousand eight hundred and four hundred eighty dollars. Their actual sum is eighteen thousand four hundred fifty. Adding an entered five hundred-dollar bill increases it to eighteen thousand nine hundred fifty; removing that record restores the total. The display rounds currency to whole dollars while JSON retains numeric amounts. Category percentage bars are separately rounded to whole percentages. The narration bar uses zero point zero four pixels per entered dollar, so a five-hundred-dollar addition adds twenty pixels. Consultation readiness is only the fraction of checked items: five of six becomes eighty-three percent after rounding, and six of six becomes one hundred. Checking a box does not verify a document, attachment, liability, deadlines or legal readiness. The source date and location fields update export metadata, but they do not rewrite existing milestone dates. Filtering the timeline does not filter damages totals or the full exported event array. These independent projections should be interpreted separately. Attorney ranking uses five entered criteria, despite the interface seven-step label: trial history weighted twenty-five percent; caseload focus twenty; communication twenty; peer standing fifteen; and contingency fairness twenty. The default first candidate contributes twenty-three point five, eighteen point four, seventeen point six, fourteen point two five and eighteen, totaling ninety-one point seven five and rounding to ninety-two. The diagram adds these weighted contributions at eight pixels per score point. Fee percentage itself is displayed but does not enter that formula; a prompted zero fee falls back to thirty-three point three because of the source truthy fallback. A newly added candidate uses preset criterion values and rounds to eighty-two. These are arbitrary authored comparisons, not independently assessed lawyer quality or recommendations. The downloaded JSON includes full event, damage, checklist and attorney arrays, while the clipboard summary includes descriptive candidate notes but not all ranking inputs. The visible event list is sorted by date; the JSON and clipboard preserve insertion order. A newly entered earlier event can consequently appear first on screen and last in those exports. Reload restores the fixture, because this source does not persist case state. Local tests check these differences without validating legal or privacy claims.