FAA / NY-METRO NOISE

Acoustic Urban Impact & Flight Noise Analyzer

Hamptons Aviation Dispute Modeling System
East Hampton Coastal Approach
Click map or drag waypoint to inspect ground decibels
WSJ Benchmark Corridor: East Hampton Eastbound Arrival (850 ft offset, 1,200 ft AGL)
Acoustic Impact Telemetry High (Severe Speech Interference)
Peak Modeled Noise
78.4 dBA
+36.4 dBA over ambient (42 dBA)
Daily Noise Dose (Leq)
71.2 dBA
34 operations / day
Complaint Probability
84%
Schultz Curve Model
Est. Property Impact
-6.8%
NDI Value Penalty
Indoor Speech Intelligibility 14% Intelligible (Interrupted)
>75 dBA: Severe Impact
65-75 dBA: Speech Disruption
50-65 dBA: Moderate Annoyance
Flight Path & Fleet Parameters
1,200 ft
850 ft
34 flights/day
42 dBA
Regulatory Framework & Dispute Context

In high-density luxury enclaves such as Wainscott, East Hampton, and Southampton, helicopter operations generating sustained sound exposure above 70 dBA Lmax violate local residential peace ordinances and cause recurring citizen litigation. Current FAA Part 161 restrictions and town airport curfew battles revolve around noise thresholds identical to this model.

Deterministic FAA INM / ISO 9613-2 Propagation Matrix

Authored acoustic formulas and fixture exceptions

Read the explanation

This page uses authored acoustic assumptions, not measured flight noise. Slant range is the square root of altitude squared plus horizontal distance squared. Outside its exact fixture, the source subtracts twenty log base ten of range over one thousand and an additional one point five per thousand feet from an aircraft constant. A hypothetical twin turbine at one thousand feet slant range gives eighty two point nine before the ambient floor. At two thousand it gives about seventy five point four. The change is about six point zero two from spreading plus one point five extra from its atmospheric term. The range bars use point one pixels per foot, lengths one hundred and two hundred. Ambient sound is a minimum floor. Fleet constants, atmospheric loss and map contours are assumptions to verify, not measured evidence or demonstrated regulatory compliance. Daily energy adds flight events and background over a fifteen hour window. The implementation uses twenty two seconds per event, despite a comment describing roughly twenty five. It converts levels to linear powers before averaging and taking the logarithm. For a hypothetical seventy dBA event peak and forty dBA ambient, ten events contribute two point two billion relative energy units, and ambient contributes point five four billion. Twenty events double only the flight term to four point four billion. The stacked bars use fifty pixels per billion units. Totals are one hundred thirty seven pixels and two hundred forty seven. The corresponding computed daily levels are about forty seven point one and forty nine point six. Doubling flights does not double a decibel value. These examples teach the source equation, not exposure advice or a health assessment. An exact input match returns fixed fixture outputs before the ordinary formula runs. That branch includes aircraft type, altitude, residence distance, flights per day and ambient, but not corridor name. It returns seventy eight point four peak, seventy one point two daily level, eighty four percent complaint and minus six point eight percent property impact. Recomputing the ordinary equation at those same numerical inputs instead gives about seventy eight point eight peak, sixty point three daily level and eight percent complaint. The two daily-level bars use four pixels per displayed dBA unit, lengths two hundred eighty four point eight and two hundred forty one point two. This comparison identifies a fixture override; it does not validate either prediction. Complaint and property fields are authored mappings with caps, not independently established probabilities or valuations. Export metadata naming standards does not prove compliance. Native changes and actual files require separate checks.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super