WIND TUNNEL ACTIVE • 65 MPH
VEHICLE PROFILE: MISSION EFFICIENCY (0.158 Cd)
REYNOLDS DRAG STATE: ULTRA-LAMINAR / STREAMLINED
SIMULATION FREQUENCY: 60 FPS • ρ = 1.225 kg/m³
Aero Tuning & Vehicle Benchmarks FLUID DYNAMICS ENGINE
0.158
VW Mission Efficiency achieves world record road-approved 0.158 Cd. Standard sedans range 0.24-0.30.
65 mph
Aerodynamic drag scales quadratically (v²); power required scales with the cube of speed (v³).
2.15 m²
Effective drag area is Cd × A. Lower frontal cross-sections dramatically reduce highway drag.
100 kWh
Net energy storage used to compute highway distance until depletion.
Highway Range & Aero Metrics CALCULATED TELEMETRY
Projected Highway Range
409miles
658 km @ 65 mph
Energy Efficiency
4.09mi/kWh
244 Wh/mi highway
Aerodynamic Power
15.9kW
78.4% of total tractive demand
Drag Force (Fd)
54.8lbf
243.8 N total fluid resistance
AERODYNAMIC BENCHMARK VERDICT
Outperforms standard family EVs by 45% at highway speeds due to ultra-low 0.158 Cd.
Fluid Formula: Fd = ½ × ρ × v² × Cd × A
Air Density (ρ): 1.225 kg/m³ (Sea level standard)
Cruising Velocity (v): 29.06 m/s (65.0 mph)
Effective Aero Area (Cd·A): 0.3397 m²
Baseline Auxiliary & Rolling Loss: 3.40 kW @ 0.010 Crr
Why 0.158 Cd Matters: At 65–75 mph highway cruising, air resistance accounts for over 75% of an electric vehicle's total energy expenditure. By trimming drag coefficient from a typical 0.23 to 0.158, Volkswagen's Mission Efficiency saves 35–45% of aerodynamic losses, extending highway range without increasing battery pack weight or rare-earth resource usage.

Drag, power and range follow different scaling rules

Read the explanation

The saved lab computes aerodynamic force as half air density times velocity squared times drag coefficient times frontal area. Holding the other inputs fixed, increasing speed from thirty to sixty miles per hour doubles velocity and multiplies drag force by four. Power is force times velocity, so aerodynamic power increases eightfold. The bars use thirty pixels per relative unit: thirty for the original power, one hundred twenty for force at double speed, and two hundred forty for power at double speed. These are relationships inside the selected simplified model, not measured vehicle test results. The selected low drag configuration has coefficient zero point one five eight and area two point one five. Their product is zero point three three nine seven square meters. The comparison configuration multiplies zero point two three zero by two point three five, giving zero point five four zero five. At five hundred pixels per square meter, the bars measure one hundred sixty nine point eight five and two hundred seventy point two five. That drag area reduction is about thirty seven point one percent. The page separately assigns a fixed forty five percent comparison sentence whenever the coefficient is at most zero point one six five. That sentence is not derived from the current area or the complete electrical range calculation. Electrical demand includes rolling and aerodynamic power divided by zero point nine two drivetrain efficiency, plus one point two five kilowatts auxiliary load. Range then divides battery energy by energy per mile. With identical demand, changing battery capacity from fifty to one hundred kilowatt hours doubles modeled range. At two pixels per kilowatt hour the capacity bars measure one hundred and two hundred. The JSON telemetry includes selected configuration, calculated power and range, plus a timestamp. Wind particles visualize the scene rather than independently solving computational fluid dynamics. The simplified fixed mass, air density and rolling resistance assumptions cannot establish actual vehicle range.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.