Scaffold Lab
Local simulation

Coding-agent systems laboratory

The model writes code. The scaffold shapes the run.

Change planning, tools, retries, tests, and context strategy. See how those assumptions alter a simulation of token burn, elapsed time, and task success.

1Planshape work
2Actuse tools
3Testobserve
4Recoverretry or stop

Harness configuration

Design the run

Model assumptions
Scaffold strategy
Run testsAdd tokens and catch incomplete work
Targeted recoveryUse failure evidence on retry

Simulated outcome

Balanced scaffold

2,000 seeded trials
Task success0%per configured assumptions
Median tokens0input + scaffold work
Median elapsed0smodel + tool latency
Cost / success$0.00failed runs included

Token-burn distribution

Frequency across simulated runs

SolvedUnsolved

One execution, step by step

A representative seeded run

1 / 1

    Scenario comparison

    Find the efficient frontier

    Points farther up succeed more often; points farther left use fewer tokens. A point is Pareto-efficient when no other saved scenario is better on both measures.

    Interpret the model

    Read the tradeoffs, not just the score

    A scaffold does not improve the underlying model in this lab. It changes how often the model gets structured opportunities to inspect, recover, and stop.

    Planning

    Spend before acting

    Planning adds an up-front token and time cost. The simulator assumes moderate planning can improve each attempt, with diminishing returns at high depth.

    Verification

    Catch plausible failures

    Tests add work but can reject an incorrect attempt. When a failure is detected, a retry can use that evidence rather than repeat the same path.

    Context

    Choose what persists

    Full history compounds token usage. Summaries preserve some evidence with less growth. Fresh retries stay cheap but discard useful observations.

    Transparent assumptions

    What the simulator computes

    Each trial draws success from a seeded pseudo-random sequence. Attempt probability starts with the selected base rate, then receives bounded adjustments for planning, tests, and targeted recovery. Token totals combine reasoning, planning, tools, verification, and context growth. Time combines token throughput and tool latency.

    Important: these coefficients are illustrative and editable only through the controls. They are not measured values from the Scaffold Effect paper.

    Attempt probability
    base + planning lift + verification lift + retry evidence
    Attempt tokens
    reasoning + plan + tool calls + tests, multiplied by context growth
    Task success
    fraction of trials with at least one accepted successful attempt
    Cost / success
    all simulated token cost divided by successful trials

    Knowledge check

    Can you reason about scaffolds?

    0 / 5 answered correctly
    Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.