AI Capability & Systemic Risk Evaluation Matrix

A grounded analytical workbench contrasting verified frontier model breakthroughs against operational hazards, "million-dollar hammer" compute externalities, and high-stakes hallucination liabilities.

1. Domain Breakthroughs vs. Structural Failure Modes Discrete Mathematics

Select an evaluation domain to inspect verified frontier capabilities vs. critical operational failure modes.

✓ Verified Frontier Capability

⚠ Structural Hazard & Downside

8.8/10
Frontier Utility
Very High
Verification Burden
High
Systemic Liability
Low CapabilityHigh Frontier Autonomy →
High HazardLow Hazard
M
C
F
B
2. "Million-Dollar Hammer" Simulator Tradeoff Engine

Simulate net operational efficiency when factoring in multi-step inference compute costs, water/energy footprints, and human verification latency.

Task Stakes / Consequence Severity: High (Legal / Tariffs / Production Code)
Reasoning Model Effort (Chain-of-Thought / Agents): Deep Agentic (Heavy Compute)
Verification Rigor Required: Line-by-Line Primary Source Audit (100%)
1.4x
Net Speed Gain
4.8 kWh
Energy / Task Batch
2.4 L
Cooling Water
Operational Verdict: High verification tax offsets initial drafting velocity. Primary lookup from official registry is faster and liability-free.
3. High-Signal Risk Critique Builder Evidence-Grounded

Move beyond outdated dismissals (e.g. "it cannot count letters") to rigorous, unassailable structural critiques based on actual frontier behavior.

Generating brief...

Assigned effort and verification factors determine a local tradeoff

Read the explanation

The saved tradeoff begins with effort three, stakes four and verification three. Assigned drafting speed is five times effort, giving fifteen. Verification penalty is three times one point eight times four times point eight, giving seventeen point two eight. Adding one point five gives denominator eighteen point seven eight; fifteen divided by this gives about point eight times net speed after rounding. At ten pixels per assigned denominator unit base overhead one point five measures fifteen, verification seventeen point two eight one hundred seventy two point eight and their total eighteen point seven eight one hundred eighty seven point eight. The denominator components sum visually. This is a local assumption, not measured research productivity, audited return on investment or an actual model execution. Keeping stakes four and effort three but reducing verification from three to one changes the denominator from eighteen point seven eight to seven point two six. The displayed speed rises from point eight to two point one times. At one hundred pixels per rounded speed factor strict point eight measures eighty, reduced verification two point one two hundred ten and rounded difference one point three one hundred thirty. The source verdict now calls this high velocity. That label is selected from assigned speed thresholds alone; it does not prove reliability, quality or appropriate review. Domain tabs swap stored scores and lists but do not change the speed formula. Actual verification work is not performed when moving this slider. Energy is separately point two times effort squared times stakes times point seven. Effort three and stakes four yield five point zero four, rounded to five point zero kilowatt hours. Water then uses the rounded energy times point five two, giving two point six liters. Effort four at the same stakes yields eight point nine six rounded nine point zero kilowatt hours, an increase of four displayed units. At twenty pixels per rounded energy unit effort-three five measures one hundred, effort-four nine one hundred eighty and difference four eighty. Verification never enters either resource formula. The text brief chooses one stored template per two dropdowns, not a generated model argument. Actual JSON exports include displayed speed and energy but omit water and the verification label. Preserve that original scope and do not call assigned scores current environmental measurements or validated legal, medical or scientific conclusions.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.