US-China AI Treaty Sandbox Marcus Doctrine

Bilateral Risk Defusion & Nobel Incentive Simulation
Diplomatic Viability 88.5%
Catastrophic Risk 14.2%
Nobel Trajectory High Potential
Treaty Status Ratified Framework

Bilateral Treaty Controls

Manipulate international constraints & inspect systemic impact
Scenario Presets
1.0e+26 FLOPs
Dual-use training hardware limits. Lower caps curb uncontrollable recursive breakout runs.
75%
Joint US-China technical audit teams inspecting datacenters for clandestine mega-clusters.
Autonomous Weapon Ban Legally binding moratorium on AI target authorization without human-in-the-loop.
85%
Cryptographic weight watermarking and CBRN-capability screening on released weights.
Nobel Peace Prize Incentive Vector 88.5 Index
Historic peacemaker incentive: Substantial mutual de-escalation presents unprecedented historic diplomatic legacy.
“Donald Trump is about to have the opportunity of a lifetime—if he is up for it... if Mr Trump were to help defuse AI’s most explosive risks, then the Nobel prize would be there for the taking.” — Gary Marcus, Guest Essay in The Economist

Global AI Threat & Stability Matrix

Interactive D3 force simulation: node tensions respond dynamically to parameter shifts
United States
China
Catastrophic Vector
Treaty Verification Hub
Nobel De-escalation Node
Catastrophic Risk 14.2% Decaying (-73% baseline)
Diplomatic Viability 88.5% Bilateral ratification odds
Inspection Coverage 75% Semiconductor verification
Geopolitical Posture Stabilized Crisis communication active
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super