AI Ethical Alignment Simulator

Askell Philosophy Lab

1. Dilemma Studio Scenarios

2. Normative Framework Weights

Utilitarian Utility 0.80
Deontological Duty 0.20
Virtue Trait Vector 0.50
Relational Care Obligations 0.30

Cytoscape.js Ethical Decision Pathway Graph

Medical Resource Triage
Principle Node
Active Decision Node
Boundary Violation Node
Winning Pathway

Alignment Trade-Off Diagnostics

Aggregate Utility Index: 0.00
Inviolable Duty Violations: 0
Virtue Balance Score: 0.00
Relational Empathy Factor: 0.00
Dominant Moral Alignment: Utilitarian

Simulated Model Persona & Output Response

Utilitarian Pragmatist
Evaluating options...
Active Operational Status: CONFIGURED & STABLE Decision Pathway: PATH_A_MAX_UTILITY

Mapping Ethical Trade-offs in AI Alignment

Read the explanation

Every AI moral dilemma pits competing normative frameworks against each other to evaluate alternative decisions. In the medical triage scenario, survival probabilities and virtue weights tally total score A against total score B. When deontology weight is low, high survival utility guides the active yellow pathway directly to Patient A. Increasing the deontology slider triggers a categorical duty violation, turning Patient A red and shifting priority to procedural fairness.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.