Price the whole AI factory, not the GPU.

Turn owned utilization, throughput, PUE, power, electricity, and capex assumptions into a comparable cost per million tokens. Every number stays inspectable.

Owned scenario CSV

Replace the fictional sample with your own assumptions. Percent utilization is entered as a decimal; all costs are annualized USD.

8 REQUIRED COLUMNS

Ready for owned assumptions.

Scenario evidence

Computed from the same parsed rows shown above. No vendor or market data is fetched.

ScenarioUtil.PUEAnnual tokensEnergy MWhEnergy costAnnual costCost / 1M
Arithmetic and units

Annual tokens = GPUs × utilization × tokens per second per GPU × 31,536,000. Facility energy = GPUs × accelerator watts × utilization × PUE ÷ 1,000 × 8,760. Cost per million = (energy cost + annualized capex) ÷ annual tokens × 1,000,000.

What the sensitivity proves

Improving utilization can increase productive token output faster than facility energy grows, while PUE reduces overhead. Neither variable should be interpreted alone: throughput, electricity price, accelerator power, and capital cost remain in the denominator and numerator.

Boundaries

This is a fictional sample and an owned-input calculator, not a forecast. It makes no live claim about IREN, Horizon, Microsoft, NVIDIA, delivery timing, contracts, performance, security prices, returns, or investment suitability.

AI Factory Cost Surface Dynamics

Read the explanation

AI economics are determined at the whole facility level rather than isolated accelerator prices. In the baseline model, fifty-five percent utilization and a 1.35 PUE yield eleven dollars and eighty-eight cents per million tokens. Applying a seventy percent utilization and 1.18 PUE target lifts annual throughput to 2.71 trillion tokens, slashing unit cost over twenty-one percent.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.