AI Legal Filing Compliance Workbench & Verification Log
Mandatory human review, citation cross-examination, and court-admissible AI certification generator
Federal Appellate Rule Directive: Lawyers filing in federal court must certify that any sections drafted, augmented, or researched with generative artificial intelligence have undergone independent human verification for citation veracity and factual accuracy under Rule 11.
United States v. Henderson, 425 F.3d 123 (10th Cir. 2005)Reporter Validated
Smith v. Ohio, 494 U.S. 541 (1990)Reporter Validated
AI Hallucination / Marker Warnings Detected:
2. Human Review Audit Checklist
Verified every statement of fact directly matches the certified district court record / appendix.
Personally read each cited decision; confirmed valid pinpoint pages, active good law status, and absence of hallucinations.
Confirmed legal analogies, standard of review, and statutory interpretations reflect counsel's independent professional judgment.
Affirmed compliance with 10th Circuit and Federal Rule requirements regarding generative AI tool disclosure.
3. Court-Admissible CertificationDate: 2026-09-18
I, Sarah Jenkins, Esq., hereby certify that any portions of this filing prepared with the assistance of generative artificial intelligence have been thoroughly reviewed by counsel for accuracy and compliance with local circuit rules.
Sarah Jenkins, Esq. (Bar No. 44821)
United States v. Meridian Corp., No. 24-1042 (10th Cir.)