| Policy Lever | Congressional Intent (e.g. Thune) | Executive Deregulation Approach | Current Active Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Federal Preemption | Comprehensive federal framework to replace patchwork 50-state regulations | Limited federal preemption; executive orders focused on specific agency actions | 65% |
| Liability & Accountability | Clear liability assignment on foundation deployers with defined safe harbors | Common law litigation reliance; disfavor of novel statutory compliance burdens | 80% |
| Frontier Export Controls | Codified multilateral restrictions with bipartisan oversight & committee review | Unilateral Executive Commerce/BIS action tailored to geopolitical trade posture | 70% |
| Agency Appropriations | Statutory authorization and dedicated line-item funding for NIST AISi and DOE | Reallocation of existing agency funds; avoidance of new bureaucratic offices | 55% |
The AI Policy Workbench models the friction and alignment tradeoffs between Congressional statutory guardrails and Executive deregulation. Five active policy levers determine four core stakeholder outcomes, balancing enterprise compliance friction against national security and public safety. When preemption is below seventy percent and state override reaches thirty-five, the engine flags state law fragmentation as the primary strategic bottleneck. Selecting a scenario preset or adjusting levers recomputes alignment live, enabling stakeholders to export a complete governance briefing instantly.