A documented audit comparing public tech executive appeals for legal guardrails against actual binding statutes, voluntary pledges, and industry lobbying surges (2023–2026).
Finding: Despite repeated high-profile executive warnings regarding catastrophic and societal hazards, major labs actively opposed state-level liability (e.g., California SB 1047) while federal action remained strictly voluntary or was rolled back.
The AI Regulation Call versus Action Explorer audits public calls for oversight against binding federal statutes from 2023 through 2026. Selecting an event like the California SB 1047 pushback updates the inspector, revealing how calls for licensing contrasted with resistance to state liability. The Discrepancy Inspector calculates a gap score of ninety-six out of one hundred while AI corporate lobbying filings climbed over three hundred percent. Filter by company or export documented evidence reports in CSV format to analyze primary citations and statutory records.