AI Safety Measures & Executive Order Compliance Evaluator
Audit frontier foundation models, high-impact algorithmic classifiers, and autonomous agent systems against emerging state and federal executive safety mandates. Calibrate red-teaming rigor, compute tracking thresholds, and emergency fail-safes.
Regulatory Gap Analysis & Action Plan
| Compliance Area | Mandate Source | Status | Recommended Remediation |
|---|
Executive Order AI Safety Frameworks
Executive orders across leading jurisdictions (such as California EO N-12-23 and White House EO 14110) establish mandatory safety benchmarks for foundation models, algorithmic tools in public agencies, and autonomous agent pipelines. This evaluator helps safety panels and enterprise architects align with these guidelines before public release.
- 10²⁶ FLOPs: Frontier compute ceiling mandating comprehensive red-teaming, CBRN evaluation suites, and hardware tracing.
- Autonomous Agent Tool Use: Systems capable of executing arbitrary shell or API commands require isolated sandboxes and cryptographic kill-switches.
- Incident Transparency: Serious safety incidents, weight theft attempts, and alignment failures require notification within 72 hours.
Frequently Asked Questions
How is the Safety Index calculated?
The score synthesizes compute intensity, autonomous execution freedoms, domain vulnerabilities, and active verification protocols across 5 core pillars: Adversarial Red-Teaming, Hardware Security, Emergency Fail-safes, Reporting Transparency, and Provenance Governance.
What qualifies as an emergency kill-switch?
An effective kill-switch must operate outside the model's runtime context. It requires cryptographic key invalidation, cluster-level network air-gapping, or physical power cutoffs that complete within under 60 seconds without software bypass.
Does my data stay private?
Yes. All calculations, radar rendering, and audit dossier generations happen 100% locally in your browser. No model weights, telemetry, or policy configurations are transmitted externally.