Air Defense Interceptor Depletion & Economic Impact Simulator

Multi-tier attrition modeling: Patriot/SAMP-T, NASAMS, and C-UAS vs power grid destruction

Presets & Doctrine
Stockpiles & Resupply Rate
Salvo Threat Intensity
Air Defense Engagement & Saturation Map
Tier 1 PAC-3 Tier 2 NASAMS Tier 3 C-UAS
Timeline Depletion & Power Attrition Curves
Macro Impact Telemetry EXHAUSTION DAY 38
Pre-Deplete Intercept
88.5%
Post-Deplete Intercept
29.4%
Grid Power Lost
7.2 GW
Est. Economic Harm
$14.8 B
Sector Interceptor Allocation
⚡ Capital Grid & Energy 45%
🏭 Eastern Heavy Industry 25%
🚢 Southern Ports & Grain 15%
🚆 Western Transit Corridors 15%
The Economist Strategic Diagnostic: At current expenditure rates, Tier 1 ballistic interceptors exhaust by Day 38. Subsequent saturation strikes inflict catastrophic damage on thermal generation and 750kV substations, reducing industrial output by ~$14.8B.
Salvo Log & Leaks
DayThreatInterceptedLeakedGrid GW

Air Defense Stockpile Depletion and Grid Attrition Dynamics

Read the explanation

In the simulator, defensive stockpiles face recurring multi-threat salvos across three layered air defense tiers. Repeated saturation salvos deplete Tier One interceptors faster than daily resupply, dropping inventory toward zero. Once exhausted, interception rates collapse, leaking unintercepted ballistic strikes into power substations and compounding economic damage.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.