Thermodynamic Lab

Antimatter Energetics & Confinement Simulator

Scenario Presets:
⚛ Dual Real-Time Visualizer
TRAP STABLE
COLLISION CHAMBER (p + N → p + N + p + p̄) 60 FPS
PENNING-MALMBERG TRAP (B-FIELD + V) 0 Trapped
⚡ Energetic & Economic Ledger
EROEI ~ 10⁻⁸
Effective Production Cost $62.5 Trillion / gram Accumulated Batch Cost: $0.00
Grid Input Energy 0.000 MWh 0.000 GJ expended
Antimatter Mass Produced 0.000 ng 0 antiprotons
Annihilation Yield ($E=mc^2$) 0.0000 J 0.000000 kWh return
Conversion Efficiency ($\eta$) 1.2 × 10⁻⁹ Thermodynamic Anergy: 99.999999%
Thermal Heat & Pion Losses (Anergy) Captured Mass (Exergy)
Waste Anergy: ~99.9999988% Exergy: ~0.0000012%
🔋 Carrier vs. Primary Source
Antimatter does not exist naturally on Earth in harvestable reserves. It must be synthesized in particle accelerators by converting kinetic energy into mass ($E=mc^2$), requiring thousands of times more energy than the mass yields upon annihilation. It acts as an energy carrier (like an ultra-dense battery), never a net source.
🧲 Penning Trap Confinement Limits
Because neutral antimatter cannot be confined magnetically without magnetic dipole moments and charged antiprotons repel one another via Coulomb forces (Brillouin limit), holding even microgram quantities requires immense cryogenic magnetic fields and extreme ultra-high vacuums ($<10^{-15}\text{ mbar}$).
☕ Historical Yield Context
In CERN's entire operating history since the 1980s, all antiprotons produced total less than 15 to 20 nanograms. Annihilating this entire historical yield with matter generates roughly 3 megajoules—enough thermal energy to boil approximately 20 cups of tea.
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super