EPL Tactical Lab Arsenal Arteta Benchmark
Verified Fabrizio Romano Source • @FabrizioRomano Captured Brief
🔴⚪️ Mikel Arteta: “It’s a big win for us and it helps because the league will be super hard this season. Tonight we see we are capable of performing at a higher level than the one in last season.”

Arteta Higher Level Benchmark: Season-over-Season Performance Analyzer

Test whether Arsenal’s tactical output mathematically satisfies Arteta’s condition for conquering a 'super hard' Premier League title race.

Projected Points (38G)
88.9
vs 89 in 23-24 (-0.1)
xG Differential / 90
+1.42
+0.22 vs 23-24 baseline
Field Tilt (Territory)
68.5%
+3.2% vs 23-24 (65.3%)
PPDA Press Intensity
8.9
+0.6 more intense (was 9.5)

Pitch Territorial & Press Distribution

High Press Overload
Def 3rd 15%
Middle 3rd 36%
Attacking 3rd 49%
Field Tilt (%) 68.5%
PPDA (Press Intensity) 8.9
Box Touches Conceded /90 13.2
Target Points Per Game (PPG) 2.34

Tactical Radar vs Prior Baselines

COMPARE BASELINE:
Baseline (2023-24) Modeled Level (Arteta Target)

Arteta 'Super Hard League' Title Requirement Matrix

Tier / Difficulty Target Pts Required PPG Modeled Gap Verdict
Arteta Higher Standard Formula: Current modeled xG diff of +1.42 yields expected PPG of 2.34 (88.9 pts). Meets 2022-23 standard (+4.9 pts) and sits within 0.1 pts of peak 2023-24.

Saved points pace and tactical heuristic arithmetic

Read the explanation

Saved two point three four points per game times thirty-eight gives eighty-eight point nine two, displayed eighty-eight point nine. Bars compare displayed scenario and ninety-point threshold at six pixels per point. This is fixed pace arithmetic, not a validated football forecast or verified league result. Saved field tilt sixty-eight point five minus midpoint fifty, times point zero four five, contributes point eight three two five. Pressing component fourteen minus eight point nine, times point zero eight, contributes point four zero eight. Bars compare contributions at two hundred pixels per heuristic unit. Coefficients are programmed assumptions, not verified empirical regression. Box component twenty-two minus thirteen point two times point zero five gives point four four. Adding baseline point two five, tilt point eight three two five and pressing point four zero eight gives one point nine three zero five, rounding one point nine three within point four-to-two point one clamp. Bars compare rounded output and clamp interval span one point seven at labeled two hundred pixels per unit. Saved initial label one point four two is not this recalculated output. Raw native export/reset preserved; actual tactical predictive validity remains unproved.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.