Aspect Ratio Studio & iPhone Duo Copycat Analyzer

Geometry Projection [Rough.js Engine]

Authentic Target

Inspected Device

Deviation Gap

TARGET: 19.5:9 (0.4615)

STATUS: Moderate Mismatch

CLONE DELTA: 4.2%

COMPUTED CORRECTION: +12px width

“Unfortunately they got the aspect ratio.” — Report via The Verge on device form-factor mimicry and cloning authentic flagship proportions.

Device & Ratio Presets SELECT SCENARIO

Manual Dimension Tuner

Inspected Width (pixels/units) 1191 px

Inspected Height (pixels/units) 2556 px

Corner Radius (Chassis Curve) 48 px

Authentic Flagship Reference Width 1179 px

Proportion Telemetry Moderate Mismatch

Authentic Ratio

19.5:9 (0.4615)

Inspected Ratio

19.3:9 (0.4660)

Geometric Deviation

4.20%

Aspect String

19.5:9 (0.4615)

Editorial Diagnostic: Analyzed

The clone mimics standard flagship bezels but stretches chassis width by +12px. It misses the authentic 19.5:9 curvature boundary.

Correction: Adjust width by +12px to match authentic aspect ratio.

Trace the saved scaling equation and explicit fixture limitations

Your browser does not support video.

Read the explanation

The default original width is eleven hundred seventy-nine pixels and inspected width eleven hundred ninety-one, both at height twenty-five hundred fifty-six. The width difference is twelve pixels. Both bars use point three five pixels per source pixel. These dimensions are the page fixture, not independently verified device specifications. Dividing width by height yields the ratios used in the general geometric comparison. At the default equal heights, the general relative ratio difference is twelve divided by eleven hundred seventy-nine, times one hundred: about one point zero one eight percent. The code instead overrides the exact representative-width branch to four point two percent. Both bars use one hundred pixels per percentage point. That override also does not check inspected height. Preserve the distinction: the displayed fixture percentage is a calibration constant, not the result of the general ratio equation. The inspected width exceeds the original by twelve pixels, so a width-only correction to the original would subtract twelve. The moderate default branch nevertheless displays plus twelve as its fixed correction text. Bars compare original eleven hundred seventy-nine with inspected eleven hundred ninety-one at point three five pixels per source pixel. This inconsistency is in the saved page; the explainer does not silently repair it. Radius changes drawing shape, not the ratio formula.