Brain ratio
Divide Brain B by Brain A. In the supplied example, 1,320 / 1,200 produces a size ratio of 1.10.
Compare proportional isometry with a user-chosen allometric exponent. The calculation is transparent; the biology still needs evidence.
The exponent is an assumption you control, not a measured fact supplied by this tool. Use a fitted value from a real study when drawing biological conclusions.
The region grows 7.41% while the whole brain grows 10.00%.
100 × (1320 / 1200)^0.75 = 107.41Because the exponent is below 1, regional volume changes more slowly than whole-brain volume in this scenario.
The power-law comparison separates the overall size change from the way one region is assumed to scale with it.
Divide Brain B by Brain A. In the supplied example, 1,320 / 1,200 produces a size ratio of 1.10.
The region follows the whole-brain ratio exactly: 10% more brain implies 10% more region. It is the comparison line, not a universal biological rule.
A positive exponent below one produces slower regional change than whole-brain change.
An exponent of one preserves the same proportional change.
An exponent above one produces faster regional change in the direction of the brain-size ratio.
An exponent becomes biologically meaningful only when it is estimated from appropriate measurements, species, developmental stages, methods, and uncertainty.
This tool never supplies a “correct” exponent. You provide the assumption so its mathematical consequences stay visible.
A scaling relationship can summarize how measurements covary. It does not by itself explain development, function, evolution, or mechanism.
Export the calculation, then record where the exponent came from, which population it describes, and how uncertainty changes the interpretation.
The JSON brief preserves the exact inputs, formula, result, comparison, and caution so the calculation can be checked later.