Norms beat rules
Elinor Ostrom's Nobel-winning work on commons governance found thriving groups use graduated sanctions and locally-made rules — not top-down bans. Online translation: visible, consistently applied norms outperform occasional mass moderation.
Ostrom, Governing the Commons (1990)
Size changes physics
Around 150 relationships (Dunbar's number), personal trust stops scaling. Big healthy communities behave like federations of small rooms — subgroups, threads, local moderators — rather than one giant floor fight.
Dunbar, 1992; observed in Discord/subreddit design
Conflict is a default, not a destiny
Platforms reward engagement, and outrage engages. Communities that thrive create spaces where the incentive is different: shared projects, service threads, questions-only channels — formats where "winning" isn't the point.
Brady et al., moral-emotional language spread, PNAS 2017
Rituals do heavy lifting
Recurring structure — weekly threads, testimonies, book clubs, service reports — gives members a reason to return that isn't arguing. Regular contribution rituals are among the strongest predictors of retention in online-community studies.
Kraut & Resnick, Building Successful Online Communities (2012)