Live Campus Checkpoint Simulation (4 Academic Terms)
Term 1 of 4 | Active Cohort: 200 Agents
Attendance Impact
-14.2%
Class attendance decay rate
Checkpoint Turnaways
342
Total student citations / denials
Cohort Dropout Rate
21.5%
Compounding academic friction
4-Year Graduation Yield
52.1%
Target institutional baseline: 75%
Empirical Policy Comparison
| Metric | Strict Policy | Supportive Policy |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance Change | -14.2% | +8.5% |
| Citation Turnaways | 342 | 0 |
| Dropout Rate | 21.5% | 8.2% |
| Graduation Yield | 52.1% | 74.6% |
Higher Education Research Context
Research in adult higher education demonstrates that policing appearance disproportionately burdens working adult, caregiver, and low-socioeconomic students. Clothing checkpoints create unnecessary friction without improving learning outcomes or class participation.
"Policing how students show up to class will NEVER lead to higher class attendance and does not lead to higher graduation rates."
Validated Simulation Proof Surface
Selected Active Policy
Strict Mandatory Dress Code
Calculated Attendance Delta
-14.2%
Turnaway Citations
342
Graduation Yield Outcome
52.1%