The Economist • Trade Defense Intelligence

Canada Retaliatory Tariff Impact Map & Senate Vulnerability Analyzer

Simulating targeted Canadian counter-tariffs on Michigan, Ohio, and Iowa in response to U.S. trade policies.
Target Battleground:
Retaliatory Duty: 25%
Cross-Border Supply Chain Corridor (Canada ↔ Midwestern Battlegrounds) Active: Michigan Auto Cluster
Export Exposure
$68.2B
Total annual state exports to Canada
Projected Shock
$1.42B
Annualized direct export loss
Vulnerable Jobs
42,600
Auto assembly & parts corridors
Senate Race Margin Impact
-0.84 pts
Incumbent party swing risk (1.4% margin)
Policy Dispute Presets
The Economist Baseline (25%)
2018 CUSMA Dispute Precedent (10%)
Maximum Pressure Counter-Duty (35%)
Targeted Counter-Schedule: Canada zeroes in on automotive corridors in Michigan, heavy manufacturing in Ohio, and agricultural processing in Iowa to trigger asymmetric political pain.
Targeted Sector Exposure Ranked by Duty Risk
Senate Electoral Transmission CRITICAL SWING
Electoral pressure model correlates county-level export workforce exposure against previous Senate victory margins.
Prior Win Margin: 1.4% Projected Margin Shift: -0.84 pts
“Canada’s counter-tariffs are not distributed randomly. By striking precisely at automotive plants in Michigan, machine tool corridors in Ohio, and soybean crushers in Iowa, Ottawa directly threatens senators defending precarious margins.”
Cross-State Battleground Vulnerability Comparison
Battleground State Primary Export Dependency Annual Exports to Canada GDP Exposure Ratio Exposed Industrial Jobs Senate Victory Margin Sensitivity Factor
Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.