Lindsay Clancy Trial: Hung Jury & Mistrial Procedure Navigator

1. Deliberation Unanimity Matrix 12 Jurors Required

In Massachusetts criminal prosecutions, verdicts must be strictly unanimous. Click jurors below to change their deliberation vote and observe how any split forces an official mistrial declaration.

Guilty Not Guilty (Psychosis / Insanity) Not Guilty (Standard)

HUNG JURY • MISTRIAL MANDATED

Because deliberation is split (8 Guilty, 4 Not Guilty by reason of lack of criminal responsibility), the jury cannot return a valid verdict. Under Mass. R. Crim. P. 31(e), the judge must discharge the jury.

2. Post-Deadlock Procedural Branching Constitutional Mechanics

Select a legal motion or Commonwealth path to inspect the governing Massachusetts statutes and Fifth Amendment Double Jeopardy protections:

Litigation Posture Comparator Commonwealth vs Defense

Issue	Commonwealth (DA)	Defense (Kevin Reddington)
Double Jeopardy	Inapplicable. Hung jury creates classical manifest necessity under United States v. Perez (1824) and Mass. precedents.	Cannot invoke Fifth Amendment bar on deadlock alone unless prosecutorial misconduct provoked mistrial.
Affirmative Defense	Maintains burden beyond reasonable doubt that defendant was criminally sane under Commonwealth v. McHoul.	Asserts postpartum psychosis destroyed capacity to appreciate wrongfulness or conform conduct to law.
Custody & Treatment	Requests continued held-without-bail status or high-security psychiatric inpatient hold pending new trial.	Argues for continued medical stabilization at Tewksbury State Hospital or specialized forensic psychiatric facility.
Post-Trial Motions	Opposes any directed verdict; argues sufficient circumstantial evidence existed for rational trier of fact.	Files Mass. R. Crim. P. 25(b)(2) to request judge enter a required finding of not guilty or reduce charges.

Estimated Procedural Timeline Next 3 – 9 Months

Expected judicial benchmarks following hung jury mistrial discharge in Plymouth County:

Day 0 – 14: Post-Trial Motions & Status Hearing

Defense files Mass. R. Crim. P. 25(b)(2) motion for directed entry of not guilty. Judge sets briefing schedule and confirms defendant's custodial housing status.

Month 1 – 2: Argument on Evidentiary Sufficiency

Court hears oral argument on whether Commonwealth presented sufficient evidence to overcome psychiatric affirmative defense as a matter of law.

Month 2 – 4: Pre-Trial Retrial Conference & Discovery Updates

If Rule 25 motion is denied, parties confer regarding supplementary expert witness depositions, updated neuropsychiatric evaluations, and motions in limine.

Month 4 – 9: Venue Assessment & New Venire Selection

Court addresses any defense motion for change of venue due to high-saturation publicity, summons a new 100+ juror venire, and commences second voir dire.

Lindsay Clancy Trial: Hung Jury & Mistrial Navigator

Durable Legal Brief & Analysis Record