Policy Lab

CLARITY Act: Intermediary vs Technology Analyzer

CoinDesk / Hermine Wong Analysis: "Questions whether the bill favors crypto intermediaries over the technology itself and whether what's good for crypto's political machine is good for crypto."
Legislative Provisions & Levers
Intermediary

Carve-outs, statutory safe harbors, and bespoke charter rights granted exclusively to registered custodians and institutional brokers.

85
Moat Barrier

Regulatory reporting and operational compliance costs that create entrenched protective moats for well-capitalized incumbents.

75
Technology

Explicit statutory shielding for software authors, smart contract publishers, and non-custodial node operators against financial intermediary licensing.

20
DC Lobby

Influence of centralized crypto trade associations and PAC capital directing statutory language to protect institutional balance sheets.

90
Technology

Legal recognition of decentralized autonomous protocols without forced intermediary intermediaries or synthetic fiduciary liabilities.

30
Impact Metrics & Structural Bias
Intermediary Bias 78.0
Tech Empowerment 35.0
Pro-Crypto Impact 42.5
Legislative Orientation Verdict
Favors Intermediaries over Technology

The bill prioritizes centralized institutional custodians and DC lobbying interests, imposing significant liabilities on open protocols while locking in incumbent privileges.

Current Proposal
Decentralized Baseline
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super