Game-Theoretic Political Simulation

Coalition Fracture Modeler

Simulate how leadership liability triggers strategic distance, hedging, and cascading defections across 40 competitive and base legislative districts.

Loyal Base
22 / 40
Hedging / Distance
10 / 40
Active Defection
8 / 40
Projected Seat Loss
-5 seats

Caucus Alignment & Vulnerability Matrix (40 Sample Districts)

Loyal Hedging Defected

Suburban & Split-Ticket Districts Leading Defection

Under a -8.5% kryptonite drag, members in districts with Cook PVI between R+0 and R+5 face general election extinction unless they break. Base members (R+12 or higher) remain incentivized to maintain complete loyalty to deter primary challenges.

Calculated using game-theoretic Nash equilibrium under Granovetter threshold cascades.

The ‘Kryptonite’ Dilemma

When a charismatic party leader's national negatives climb, their coattails reverse into an anchor. Candidates in swing battlegrounds must choose between losing moderate independents in November or facing an enraged partisan primary base in spring.

Threshold Cascade Dynamics

Mark Granovetter's threshold model dictates political defection: the first defector absorbs maximum retribution. But once a critical mass (15-20%) fractures, the collective safety penalty dissolves, unleashing sudden non-linear breaking waves.

PVI & Donor Hegemony

Districts with Cook Partisan Voting Index (PVI) greater than R+8 rarely break, regardless of national toxicity, because the primary election remains the only existential hurdle. The break is almost always initiated in educated suburban districts.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super