CFB

College Football Ranking Defense & Champion Disrespect Analyzer

Policy modeling & ballot committee analytics on reigning champions vs. rising challengers

@barstoolsports "Should the reigning national champs hold the top ranking until they lose? Katic can’t believe the Indiana disrespect."
Audited Curation Fixture Loaded

1. Committee Ballot Policy

Active Preset

2. Ballot Weight Formulation

75%

Protects titleholder ranking (#1 spot) solely because they haven't lost yet.

25%

Values ranked wins, strength of schedule, and on-field dominance this season.

1.2x
0.8x
Current Committee Stance High Inertia Protection
Simulated #1 Team
Reigning National Champion
Disrespect Target
Indiana Hoosiers
Poll Ranking Gap
4 Spots Lower than Resume

Difference between Indiana's poll rank vs pure resume merit.

Indiana Disrespect Index
82.4 High Disrespect

Quantifying Katic & Barstool's outrage metric (0-100 scale).

Champ Retention Index
94.0% Secure

Likelihood titleholder stays #1 without an outright loss.

Simulated Ranking Order vs. Resume Strength

Comparing reigning champion inertia against undefeated challengers

Indiana Defending Champ Top Challengers
Simulated Ballot Top 5
Rank Program Record Resume Score Inertia Bonus Final Rating

Debate Verdict & Causal Analysis

Under the 75% Defending Champ Inertia policy, traditional voters keep the reigning champion at #1 regardless of blowout margins or schedule strength. Meanwhile, Indiana's historic undefeated start is penalized with a 4-rank deficit compared to pure resume merit, explaining Katic's vocal frustration.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super