Independent evidence, under pressure

When does agreement earn trust?

Build a tribunal. Predict first. Then watch shared bias turn five voices into one repeated mistake.

Awaiting prediction Observed verdict -- Quorum 3 of 5

What the court is measuring

Agreement is only evidence when the errors can disagree.

Independent competence compounds

Five independent jurors at 70% accuracy produce an 83.7% correct majority in the exact binomial model. Each vote carries some new information.

Shared bias repeats one draw

At 100% correlation, five unanimous voices still contain one effective observation. Panel accuracy falls back to the individual baseline.

Quorum buys caution with delay

A stricter gate can turn marginal decisions into escalation. Fewer wrong resolutions may mean fewer resolutions overall.

P(panel correct) 83.7% n=5 · p=.70 · independent majority

Worked reasoning

The extra confidence is not free.

For a five-juror majority, add the probabilities of exactly three, four, or five correct independent votes. Correlation removes those independent chances and replaces them with a shared outcome.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.