Court Caseflow & Backlog Clearance Modeler
Simulate trial capacity, judicial sitting days, cracked trial rates, and complainant attrition risk for criminal courts tackling severe trial backlogs in serious sexual offences (RASSO) and complex indictable crimes.
Clearance Dynamics & Caseflow Impact
+42 cases / month (Accumulating)Projected Backlog Path vs. Disposal Capacity
Caseflow Stage Friction Breakdown
Monthly throughput velocity by stageIntervention Milestone Trajectory
Forecast at 6-month operational intervals| Month | Outstanding Cases | Net Monthly Δ | Median Days to Trial | Complainant Attrition Risk | Status |
|---|
Operational Foundations: Tackling Chronic Trial Delays
Severe criminal court backlogs—particularly in Rape and Serious Sexual Offences (RASSO) in England and Wales—create compounding friction. Long delays between charge and trial cause severe witness attrition, evidence degradation, and breaches of speedy-trial rights.
Section 28 Pre-Recorded Evidence
Allows vulnerable victims and key witnesses to record their cross-examination weeks after plea and trial preparation hearings (PTPH), decoupling their testimony from the main trial date and preserving testimony integrity.
Cracked & Ineffective Trials
A trial is 'cracked' when it ends on the day without proceeding (e.g., late guilty plea or prosecution offering no evidence); it is 'ineffective' if adjourned due to missing defense counsel, digital disclosure disputes, or witness non-attendance.
Little's Law in Court Systems
Work in Progress (Backlog) = Inflow Rate × Cycle Time. If effective trial capacity is lower than new charge receipts, the queue grows linearly while wait times compound exponentially, driving witness withdrawal rates past 30%.