Policy Sliders
Real-Time Input
Select Scenario Preset:
35%
Explicit classification, CFTC/SEC jurisdiction boundaries & stablecoin rules.
25%
Congressional committee cohesion vs election-cycle political deadlock.
40%
US attractiveness relative to EU MiCA, Singapore MAS, UAE VARA frameworks.
55%
Baseline institutional interest, venture deployment & ETF capital base.
Capital Routing Network Simulation
Outflow to Offshore Jurisdictions
US Onshore
Foreign Hubs (EU/UAE/APAC)
Institutional Capital
Nodes: 16 Institutions & Jurisdictions
Simulation Speed: Active Dynamic Force
Simulated Impact Results
US Market Leadership Index
38.5%
Global crypto innovation & liquidity share
US Onshore Capital Retention
$42.8B
Of estimated $100B institutional deployment pool
Legislative Status
Deadlocked / Missed Opportunity
Partisan friction stalled the comprehensive Clarity Act.
Institutional Jurisdiction Shift
Offshore Migration Active
Talent & node deployment shifting overseas
Contextual Background: Brian Armstrong on the Clarity Act
In an interview with Scott Melker, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong stated that political friction killed the Clarity Act, describing it as a "missed opportunity for the US to lead." Without statutory codification delineating digital asset classification between commodities and securities, US institutional capital retention has diminished relative to jurisdictions with settled regulatory guardrails like the European Union (MiCA) and the UAE. This simulator models the direct sensitivity between bipartisan consensus, clear legal definitions, and institutional capital routing.