Clarity before commentary

Separate the claim from the heat.

Map the post's assertions, notice its framing, and record what evidence you would need before taking a position or responding.

“I make the point that we need a strong defence to protect all that is good in our society...”

Review progress

This workspace keeps the source visible while you test each statement for clarity and support.

1 / 3
One claim marked for review

A neutral reading lens

Analysis is not agreement or rebuttal. It is a pause between a strong reaction and a defensible response.

A statement that can be checked, clarified, or supported. A value judgment may still matter, but it should not be presented as a verified fact.
Words that position people or motives, such as labels, sarcasm, or appeals to what is good. Notice them before deciding whether the underlying point holds.

Claim map

Mark the statements you have reviewed and keep the source wording close.

A strong defence protects what is good in society.Type: value and policy premise
Support for Ukraine is being condemned by an eager Putin tool.Type: attribution and loaded framing
Russia supports the “peace lovers”.Type: broad prediction and sarcasm

Your review brief

Write the evidence or question that should sit beside the source before you respond.

Manual claim review, the meter floor and local notes

Read the explanation

The page offers three manually checked review statements. Each checked box contributes one to the reviewed count. Bars compare one checked item with all three items at one hundred fifty pixels per count. The source maps a policy premise, attribution with loaded framing, and broad prediction with sarcasm. Checking a box records the user marking that review activity; it does not fact-check a geopolitical assertion or validate agreement, evidence or a conclusion. For n checked boxes, the source meter width is the larger of ten percent and n divided by three times one hundred percent. With no checked boxes, the count is zero of three, but the bar still shows ten percent. With one checked box, it shows one third, about thirty-three point three percent. At four pixels per percentage point, the bars show forty pixels and about one hundred thirty-three point three pixels. The visual floor prevents an empty bar; it is not ten percent verified evidence. The source stores the three checkbox values and untrimmed review notes as two properties. The Download buttons export the same brief containing reviewed count and notes, while Copy writes the raw notes only. Bars compare two stored properties with two distinct output actions at one hundred fifty pixels per count. Reload restores both properties. Two explanation accordions open and close independently. There is no reset or automated evidence retrieval, model analysis, political fact-checking or external submission.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.