28 U.S.C. § 517 DOJ Antitrust Division

DOJ Antitrust Private Litigation Statement of Interest Analyzer

Fact Pattern & Posture

DOJ frequently intervenes under § 517 at the MTD stage to correct legal standards for concerted action.

Critical Sensitivity
Hub-and-Spoke Risk
68% Vendor Share
Fragmented (10%) Moderate (40%) Dominant (80%+)

DOJ § 517 Intervention Gauge

CRITICAL
88/100
High Probability of Federal Amicus Filing
Section 1 Trigger
Per Se Illegal
Hub & Spoke
High Exposure
DOJ Priority
Tier 1 Target

Statutory Exposure Diagnostic

Sherman Act § 1 (15 U.S.C. § 1)

Concerted Action & Algorithmic Price-Fixing

Critical

DOJ asserts that delegating pricing discretion to a common algorithmic intermediary satisfies concerted action under § 1, even without direct communication between competitors.

Sherman Act § 2 (15 U.S.C. § 2)

Monopolization / Shared Market Power

Elevated

PropTech market share (>60%) creates single-firm or shared monopoly pricing leverage, amplifying DOJ interest in structural injunctions.

Clayton Act § 7 / FTC § 5 / Labor

Remedial Scope & Settlement Preclusion

Moderate

Private settlement terms that preserve algorithmic coordination while dismissing monetary claims will trigger immediate federal objection.

DOJ 28 U.S.C. § 517 Precedents

Active Dockets

Clause Redlining & Safe Harbor

DOJ Compliance Standard: Use historic data (>90 days old), aggregated across ≥5 competitors where no single entity represents >25% of the metric, with unconstrained manual override authority.
Calculated DOJ intervention score is 88 out of 100 with Critical exposure under Sherman Act Section 1.
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super