NFL Sub-In Analytics

Drew Lock QB Relief & Readiness Simulator

"It's the same thing every week. [I] don't know when my number's going to get called. I've done everything up to this point... to be ready for moments like this."

— Drew Lock on his mentality after subbing in for Sam Darnold
Source: @SportsCenter Verified Reach: 60,271 Impressions Context: Subbed for Sam Darnold Engagements: 337 Likes · 18 Reposts
Career Sub-Ins 14
Career Relief Comp % 59.8%
Readiness Index 88.4
Preparation & Situational Presets
Weekly 2nd-Team Reps 24 reps
Dedicated Film Study 18 hrs/wk
Sideline In-Game Warmup Level 85%
Expected EPA / Play +0.12
Estimated Success Rate 62.4%
Passer Rating Index 89.6
Calculated Sub Readiness 88.4 / 100
Preparation Duration vs. Sub-In Efficiency (EPA)
Backup Curve Operating State NFL Avg Baseline
Situational Sub-In Probability & Readiness Profile Real-time projection
Model Calibrated: Drew Lock sub-in simulation active. Expected EPA: +0.12 per play at 88.4 Readiness Index.
Drew Lock Career Notable Relief & Sub Appearances
Verified career game-log samples
Opponent / Game Starter Replaced Quarter Entered Passing Line EPA / Play Result / Outcome

Saved quarterback preparation coefficients

Read the explanation

Source repetition delta against twenty-four baseline times point zero zero five makes hypothetical thirty-two reps add point zero four. Holding other preparation inputs at baseline, default scenario EPA point one two becomes point one six. Bars compare EPA values at four thousand pixels per unit. Assigned coefficients are not measured player effects. Same hypothetical preparation delta point zero four times fifty-five adds two point two to readiness base eighty-eight point four, reaching ninety point six inside source clamps. Bars compare base and hypothetical readiness at six pixels per point. This index is heuristic, not proof of actual readiness. Source displayed passer rating combines seventy-five plus EPA times eighty-five plus readiness times point one five. Baseline rounds ninety-eight point five. Our hypothetical thirty-two-rep scenario rounds one hundred two point two. Bars compare at five pixels per rating point. This is not the standard official NFL passer rating formula or a verified performance prediction. Complete native raw readiness JSON/reset and resize preserved.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.