Ballroom Analytics & Scoring Studio

DWTS Judge Score Re-Analyzer & Fairness Sandbox

Inspired by Witney Carson’s defense of Guillermo Rodriguez against overly harsh remarks. Adjust technical penalties, audience sentiment, and entertainment weighting to measure scoring bias in real time.

Case Studies:

Routine & Panel Settings

Guillermo Rodriguez
Raw Judges’ Scorecards (1–10)
Judge 1
Judge 2
Judge 3
3.5
Strict ballroom fundamentals, posture, precision
9.2
Crowd engagement, energy, musicality, comedic timing
9.5
In-studio cheering, social reaction, fan excitement
1.8
Multiplier for technical deductions (1.0 = neutral, >1.5 = punitive)

Fairness Analysis & Adjusted Score

Cha-Cha-Cha / Novelty
Raw Judge Avg
4.3
Total 13 / 30
Fairness Gap
+55%
Over-penalized
Official Panel Verdict
Critique uncalled for: entertainment premium outweighs minor technical deduction.
Scorecard Comparison: Raw vs Fair Rubric
Raw Scores Adjusted Target
Generated Critique Brief Summary
Contestant Guillermo Rodriguez: Adjusted score 6.8 (Delta +2.4 vs raw 4.3 average). Recommendation: Adjust judge penalty weight for novelty numbers.
Copied to clipboard!
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super