Track matter, not metaphors.

Compare living biomass and free nutrients under zero mortality versus mortality with partial recycling. Every equation and limit stays visible.

CLOSED TWO-POOL MODELTEACHING SCENARIO · NOT A PLANETARY FORECAST
NO MORTALITY BIOMASS60.000.00 free nutrients
TURNOVER BIOMASS4.967.80 free nutrients
CUMULATIVE TURNOVER85.23biomass units
MODEL STATUSDECLINEcycling does not guarantee stability

What the model shows

Mortality returns a fraction of biomass to the free pool, so nutrients remain available longer than in the no-mortality comparison.

What it cannot show

No genetics, selection, age structure, species interaction, external input, thermodynamics, consciousness, or apoptosis is modeled. It cannot prove evolution requires death.

COMPARISON COMPLETE · BASELINE 60.00 / 0.00 · TURNOVER 4.96 / 7.80 · 85.23 RECYCLED

Turnover frees nutrients. It does not guarantee balance.

0.00BASELINE FREE NUTRIENTS
7.80TURNOVER FREE NUTRIENTS
85.23CUMULATIVE TURNOVER

Partial recycling keeps matter moving, but losses and growth dynamics still reduce standing biomass. This bounded result supports a mechanism, not the source's universal philosophical conclusion.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.