โ๏ธ Defense Policy
500k Voters
CISA technical support, EI-ISAC threat sharing & coordinator status.
Paper verification vs paperless direct recording electronic (DRE).
Local budget for physical security, training, and MFA pollbooks.
24/7 automated network anomaly inspection on voter database gateways.
๐ Multi-Tier Election Infrastructure Topology
โ Network Normal
โก Threat Injection
Live Testing
Overall Integrity Score
96/100
High resilience with multi-layer defense
Air-Gap Breach Risk
0.0% (Physical isolation verified)
Tabulators contain no network interfaces
Paper Audit Resilience
100% verifiable via Risk-Limiting Audit
Independent hand recount mathematically proven
Voter Roll Tamper Detection
Immediate Albert Sensor alert (sub-minute response)
CISA threat feed & EI-ISAC automated triangulation
๐ Mathematical Risk-Limiting Audit (RLA) Verification Engine
Kaplan-Markov Statistical Model
A Risk-Limiting Audit (RLA) provides mathematically provable confidence ($1 - \alpha$) that a full hand recount of paper ballots would confirm the true winner, regardless of any hypothetical machine error or software breach.
Statistical Sample Computation:
Estimated Ballots to Audit: 2,400
Audit Confidence: 95.0%
Formula: $N_{sample} \approx \lceil \frac{-\ln(\alpha)}{2 \cdot (margin)^2} \rceil \cdot \text{finite population factor}$.
As victory margin widens, required hand-count sample size decreases exponentially.