EPA Regulatory Trade-Off Model

EPA Power Plant Emissions Repeal & Cost-Impact Simulator

Simulating the EPA's power plant greenhouse gas rule rollback trade-offs as reported by The Associated Press

Policy Parameters 10-Year Horizon
Scenario Presets:
100%
0% retains strict emissions limits; 100% is total regulatory revocation.
180 GW
Operating US coal-fired generation subject to emission standard compliance.
520 GW
Base-load and combined cycle natural gas fleet affected by standards.
$51 / metric ton
Federal interagency benchmark per ton of carbon dioxide damages ($51 baseline).
Regulatory Context: In the announced action, EPA projected more than $300B in avoided compliance expenditures, scrubbers, and carbon-capture retrofit mandates, alongside increased emissions across fossil fleets.
Impact Balance Assessment Model Calculated
Industry Compliance Savings
$312.5B
Avoided capital, CCS & efficiency retrofit costs
Estimated CO₂ Emissions Increase
+485.2 Mt/yr
Additional annual power sector GHG footprint
Social Cost of Carbon Increase
$247.4B
Cumulative monetized climate externality damage
Net Economic Benefit
$65.1B
Savings exceed monetized carbon damage
Cost-Benefit Trade-off Curve (0% - 100% Repeal)
Industry Savings
Social Climate Cost
Current Operating Point
Fleet Sector Contribution Breakdown
Sector Fleet Effective Capacity Annual Δ CO₂ Industry Savings
Coal-Fired Units 180 GW 333.0 Mt $202.5B
Natural Gas Units 520 GW 152.2 Mt $110.0B
Total Power Fleet 700 GW 485.2 Mt $312.5B
Source grounding: Associated Press dispatch on EPA power plant greenhouse gas emission limits repeal saving industry more than $300 billion. Externality model based on Interagency Working Group social cost of carbon methodologies ($51/ton standard discount rate baseline).
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super