Study Parameters
10,000
1.05
0.02
0.08
0.05
Adjusted Effect (95% CI)
0.89 - 1.24
p-value
0.520
Statistical Power
0.182
EVIDENCE GRADE
Low Certainty
Conclusion: Effect estimate is consistent with null hypothesis when controlling for measured confounders.
Forest Plot: Unadjusted vs. Confounder-Adjusted Effect Estimate
Statistical Power Curve (N vs. Power)
Comparative Study Design Matrix
| Design Type | Vulnerability to Confounding | Causal Inferential Strength | Typical GRADE Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) | Low (Randomization balances unknown confounders) | High | High Certainty |
| Cohort Study | Moderate-High (Requires measurement & adjustment) | Moderate | Low Certainty |
| Case-Control Study | High (Recall bias + unmeasured confounding) | Low-Moderate | Very Low Certainty |
Epidemiological Evidence Mapper Summary & Export
Evidence Grade: Low Certainty (High Confounding Risk)
p-value: 0.52000000000000002
Power: 0.182
CI Low: 0.89
CI High: 1.24
Conclusion: Effect estimate is consistent with null hypothesis when controlling for measured confounders.
Click "Export Full Summary Report" to generate text export.