Interactive Target Sandbox Target: 44px (Touch)
Click / Tap the glowing circular target. Real-time motor jitter applied.
Input Modality Touch Glass
44px
2.5 px
40%
Ergonomic Evaluation & Telemetry
Mean Accuracy Rate
68.5%
Hits within target boundary
Avg Error Offset
14.2 px
Radial deviation from center
Frustration Score
7.4 / 10
HCI cognitive-motor friction
Ergonomic Rating
Moderate Strain
Gross vs Fine motor workload
Recommended Target Size: 56px for current physical profile.
Capacitive glass screens require sufficient conductive moisture and steady fingertip pad contact. Drier skin reduces capacitance, creating missed taps, while physiological tremors displace 44px touch targets. A physical mouse recruits whole-arm gross motor control, stabilizing accuracy.
Recent Interaction Samples 20 / 20 recorded
# Mode Result Offset Effective Contact

Why Desktops Are Often Easier for Older Adults Than Touchscreens

Modern capacitive touchscreens require two physical prerequisites often taken for granted: sufficient skin moisture to conduct electrical charge across the digitizer grid, and fine motor stability to jab a precise target on a smooth, frictionless plane of glass. With normal aging, natural reductions in skin moisture can render taps literally unread by capacitive sensors. Furthermore, mild physiological tremors cause fingertips to slide or land outside standard 44px buttons.

Conversely, desktop computers shift pointing from delicate individual finger joints to gross motor muscle groups (the palm, wrist, and forearm resting stably on a desk). The physical mouse provides tactile mechanical clicks, physical friction, resting palm support, and large readable monitors, avoiding fingerprint smearing, frustrating miss-taps, and visual obstruction.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super