Read the explanation
Each rule is tested once against seller evidence and once against buyer evidence. Three rules therefore produce six evaluations. Bars show three conditions and six checks at seventy pixels per count. In the sample, both parties meet the four-file minimum and the time cutoff, while only the seller matches the expected checksum. One of the three conditions therefore has divergent pass booleans. These are supplied JSON comparisons, not authenticated delivery, contract enforcement or a release decision. The source marks a condition divergent only when seller and buyer pass booleans differ. If both checksums fail the same expected value, there are two failed evaluations and zero divergent conditions. Bars show two failures and zero disputes at one hundred fifty pixels per count. The source labels that result aligned even if the two supplied checksum values differ. Aligned means matching pass outcomes, not successful acceptance, fairness, legal validity or permission to release funds. Min uses JavaScript numeric coercion, max ISO compares parsed dates, and equals uses strict equality. Bars compare three operator labels with zero external evidence-authentication checks at one hundred fifty pixels per count. Missing values fail; invalid dates also fail. Rules and evidence pass a local schema check, but that schema does not authenticate their truth. Export retains every rule, supplied bundle, evaluation and limitation. Reload returns the sample fields even when previous input strings remain stored. No blockchain, payment, model or legal process is executed.