Estimated end-to-end response time
Speed changes the product, not just the wait.
Model how token throughput, first-token latency and parallel demand shape the AI experiences that are practical to ship. Compare a baseline system with a faster one, then inspect the bottleneck instead of trusting a headline benchmark.
Estimated end-to-end response time
Generation speed limits turn-taking.
The baseline spends most of the interaction producing output. Faster decoding can move this product from “wait for an answer” toward a conversational loop.
See where speed compounds.
A fast decoder matters differently at 100 output tokens than at 10,000. The charts expose sensitivity, queue pressure and the cost tradeoff instead of reducing the decision to a single tokens-per-second number.
Output-length sensitivity
Estimated latency as generated tokens increase
60-second queue simulation
Pending requests under the current traffic assumptions
Saved comparisons
Store scenarios in this browser, reload them later or export the current assumptions for a design review.
No saved scenarios yet.
Product design prompts
Use the calculated constraints to ask a better question than “is this model fast?”
If each turn drops below two seconds, can the interface become an active dialogue instead of a submit-and-wait form?
Fast inference is a systems variable.
Tokens per second
Decode throughput measures how quickly output tokens arrive after generation starts. It strongly affects long answers, agent loops and batch work, but it does not include prompt processing or queue delay.
Time to first token
TTFT is the delay before streaming begins. It includes request handling, scheduling and prompt prefill. For voice and direct manipulation interfaces, TTFT can matter more than peak decode speed.
Concurrency and queueing
Traffic can overwhelm a fast individual request. Little’s Law links request rate, response duration and work in progress. When expected concurrent requests approach available slots, queue delay rises sharply.
Context and prompt caching
Large inputs increase prefill work. Reusing cached prefixes can reduce both time and cost, but only when requests share stable prompt segments and the serving system supports cache reuse.
What this model leaves out
This lab does not simulate model quality, speculative decoding acceptance, batch composition, network jitter, tool-call latency, retries, hardware failures or provider rate limits. Validate promising scenarios against measured production traces.