Multi-State Plaintiff Coalition (18 States)
18 States ActiveAttorneys General from 18 states have joined federal lawsuits against DHS asserting sovereign injury, public health harms, and procedural violations. Click any state to inspect jurisdiction profile:
Lead co-counsel state. Cites economic loss from delayed employment authorization, higher state healthcare utilization costs, and procedural notice defects under 5 U.S.C. § 553.
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) Claims
Court Challenge CountsRegulatory Impact Simulator
Adjustment of Status CohortsModel how the contested DHS restrictions impact green card application volumes, backlogs, and denial risk across immigration cohorts.
Current vs. Contested DHS Rules
Substantive Comparison| Adjudication Pillar | Current Framework | Contested Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Public Charge Standard | 1999 Field Guidance Primary reliance on cash assistance only. | Expanded Wealth Test Weighs credit scores, english proficiency, & health insurance. |
| Employment-Based I-485 | Standard Review Labor cert verification with discretionary interviews. | Heightened Hurdles Mandatory re-evaluations, wage tier penalizations. |
| Affidavit of Support (I-864) | 125% FPG Threshold Joint sponsor readily accepted without penalty. | Heavy Negative Weight Heavy scrutiny on joint sponsors, credit checks enforced. |
Live Brief Summary Excerpt
Auto-Compiled JSON DataCase Dossier & Sources
Legal Action DocumentationDepartment of Homeland Security (DHS) Final Rule altering green card eligibility, affidavits of support, and public charge determinations under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
8 U.S.C. § 1255 (Adjustment of status of nonimmigrant to that of person admitted for permanent residence); 5 U.S.C. § 706 (Administrative Procedure Act scope of judicial review).
Reported by CNN (@CNN post 2099525484769882207): "States sue Trump administration to block a new DHS rule that would make it harder for some immigrants to get green cards."