Pima County Investigative Bureau / Sheriff Audit Model

Pima County Investigative Staffing & Experience Auditor

Investigative Roster

DOJ Standard: 1:2 Lead/Cases

Operational Policies

Supervisory & Case Clearance Dynamics

Live Simulation State
Composite Risk Index
88.4
CRITICAL DEFICIT
Supervisory Span
1:4.0
Standard: 1:2.0
Lead Case Burden
6.0
Standard: max 3.0 / Lead
Experience Ratio
20.0%
Min Target: ≥ 40%
Investigative Triage & Clearance Latency Curve Current Operating Point: 18 Cases @ 3 Leads
Investigative Metric / Pipeline Stage Current Model Benchmark Norm Status / Vulnerability
First 48-Hours Critical Response Coverage 33.3% ≥ 85.0% HIGH BOTTLENECK
Search Warrant & Forensic Review Delay +38.4 hrs ≤ 8.0 hrs EVIDENTIARY RISK
Unsupervised Novice Primary Lead Rate 66.7% 0.0% PROCEDURAL DEFICIT
Estimated Annual Homicide Clearance Projection 38.2% 61.4% (Natl Avg) SUB-AVERAGE

Union Audit Finding & Procedural Assessment

  • Severe Experience Dilution: Only 3 of 15 detectives possess certified lead homicide credentials while handling 18 concurrent major homicides.
  • Supervisory Bottleneck: Lead detectives spend 64% of operational time reviewing novice filings, stalling proactive critical-window canvassing.
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super