Projected 60m Distance
57.412 km
Terminal Speed
57.41 km/h
Lap Time (250m)
15.68 s
Power to Weight
6.20 W/kg
VELODROME: Grenchen (Indoor 250m) RIDER SPEED: 57.4 km/h (15.9 m/s) AERO DRAG FORCE: 25.3 N CURVE G-FORCE: 1.54 G (at 42° bank) EST. TOTAL LAPS: 229.6 Laps
Virtual Clock:
00:00

Power Dissipation Breakdown 440 W

Aero Drag: 88.5% (389W)
Rolling: 9.3% (41W)
Drivetrain: 2.2% (10W)

Historical UCI Hour Benchmarks Official Records

Rider Distance Power CdA Delta vs Current
How the Cycling Aerodynamic & Pacing Physics Model Works

1. The Governing Cubic Resistance Equation

At high track cycling speeds (>50 km/h), aerodynamic drag accounts for nearly 90% of all resistance. The mechanical power delivered to the rear wheel follows the classic equation:

P_wheel = (0.5 · ρ · CdA · v² + Crr · m · g) · v

Accounting for drivetrain efficiency (η = 1 - loss), the rider's sustained pedaling power is P_rider = P_wheel / η. The simulation solves for velocity v via Newton-Raphson iteration.

2. The Remco Evenepoel Factor

Remco Evenepoel is renowned in modern cycling for achieving one of the lowest drag coefficients in professional peloton history (estimated CdA ~0.190–0.200 m² due to his compact 171 cm torso and hyper-low aerodynamic tuck). While Filippo Ganna produces ~460W with a larger frontal area (CdA ~0.218 m²), Remco can theoretically match or exceed Ganna's 56.792 km world record with ~430–445W sustained.

3. Altitude vs Air Density Trade-off

Historically, riders like Eddy Merckx (1972) and Victor Campenaerts raced at Aguascalientes or Mexico City (~1,800–2,200m altitude) where air density ρ drops below 1.00 kg/m³, reducing aero resistance by ~18%. However, reduced oxygen saturation impairs human aerobic VO2 max power by 8–12%. This simulator lets you calibrate that exact trade-off.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super