Documented Events 0 No incidents entered
Third-Party Spillover 0% Threats targeting current partner
Credible Threats 0 Bodily harm or property threats
Course of Conduct Pending Legal multi-incident continuity
Harassment & Threat Velocity Timeline
Threat of Violence Target: Partner/BF Harassment Violation
Earliest Event Chronological Continuity (Course of Conduct) Latest Event
# Date & Time Channel & Target Incident Details & Verbatim Evidence Preserved Files Actions

Civil Harassment / Protective Order Assessment

Document at least two distinct incidents to satisfy statutory "Course of Conduct" criteria for protective injunctions.

Legal Evidence Standards & Preservation Best Practices

1. Third-Party Harassment Doctrine

Under state protective order statutes (such as California Civil Harassment Code § 527.6 and DVPA), credible threats directed at a petitioner's current romantic partner or family members can constitute unlawful violence and harassment intended to terrorize the primary petitioner.

2. Preserving Full Digital Metadata

Screenshots alone can be challenged. Always capture full screen borders with device clock, phone numbers/handles (not just contact nickname), and export uncompressed original media files. Note police CAD event numbers or call logs whenever threats occur.

3. Course of Conduct Continuity

Courts require showing a "continuity of purpose" through a pattern of behavior. Documenting dates, communication frequency spikes (e.g. 15 unanswered calls in 1 hour), and explicit cease requests demonstrates non-consensual harassment.

Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super