Does the evidence table cover the whole claim?

Check participants, factions, dates, and named systems. A scope pass is not a truth verdict.

Structured evidence

Scope verdicts

NOT RUN
-CLAIMS ALIGNED
-OBSERVATIONS
-PARTICIPANTS
-FACTIONS

CLAIM BY REQUIRED DIMENSION

--

Run the sample

Exact missing requirements will appear here.

WAITING
Parsers ready

Coverage is narrower than certainty.

A participant count tests breadth, not independence. A faction set tests stated scope, not factual truth. A named-platform set prevents a few observations from becoming an every-platform claim.

Scope is explicit

Requirements are compared as exact sets and minimums. There is no weighted credibility score.

Truth needs more review

Transcript quality, source independence, incentives, and alternative explanations remain outside this table.

Keep tactics out

The sample codes institutional and methodological claims only; it contains no jailbreak or attack instructions.

COMPLETED CLAIM-SCOPE AUDIT

Audit pending

-scope aligned
-participants
-factions

This tool checks coding-table scope only. It does not establish factual truth, causality, transcript quality, source independence, or platform safeguard effectiveness. The bundled rows are synthetic.
Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.