1 12-Juror Deliberation Room
Click buttons to reallocate jurors2 Judicial Bench & Procedural Docket
Impasse Reported🏛️ The Tuey-Rodriguez Charge
Derived from Commonwealth v. Tuey (1851) & Commonwealth v. Rodriquez (1974), Massachusetts' version of the federal Allen "dynamite" charge urges minority jurors to re-examine their views without surrendering honest convictions.
- Anti-Coercion Rule: Judge cannot single out minority jurors or force compromise.
- Due Process Limit: Can generally be given only once under strict appellate scrutiny.
🧠 McHoul Insanity Standard
Under Commonwealth v. McHoul (1977), a defendant is not criminally responsible if, as a result of mental disease or defect, she lacks substantial capacity to:
- Cognitive Prong: Appreciate the criminality/wrongfulness of her conduct; or
- Volitional Prong: Conform her conduct to the requirements of the law (postpartum psychosis defense).
⚖️ Mistrial & Double Jeopardy
When a jury is genuinely hung after statutory deliberation requirements:
- Manifest Necessity: A hung jury creates legal necessity to terminate trial without prejudice.
- No Double Jeopardy Bar: The Commonwealth retains the full constitutional right to re-try the defendant with a newly empaneled 12-juror jury.
📋 Export Official Deliberation Dossier
Download the real-time record containing juror vote distribution, deadlock round history, active judicial charge, and appellate procedural implications.