A viewer-controlled Lock Upp comparison

Can one mistake equal a pattern?

Separate what happened from how people were treated. Set your own assumptions for Akansha and Shreya, then inspect the gap.

Build the comparison

Two sides.
One standard.

This tool does not decide what happened in the episode. Every value below is your scenario, grounded only in the source post's Akansha-versus-Shreya fairness question.

Akansha

The post frames this side as one mistake.

4
1
8
Responsibility2.3
Treatment8.7

Shreya

The post frames this side as repeated mistakes.

3
8
3
Responsibility5.9
Treatment2.0

Choose your standard.

The formula stays visible. Only the weight given to severity versus repetition changes.

Your scenario says

Response inversion

Shreya carries more scenario responsibility, while Akansha receives more scenario treatment. Under this lens, the response points away from the responsibility pattern.

Scenario saved locally

Responsibility

Severity × 42% + repetition × 58%. This is a transparent weighting, not a factual judgment.

Treatment

Public bashing × 65%, plus 3.5 points when punishment cell is included. Values come entirely from your scenario.

Super generates helpful tools and automates fact-checking across the internet proactively. If you enjoyed this tool, build your own with Super and share it with a friend.