No Surprises Act Dispute Benchmark & QPA Court Ruling Simulator Court Ruling Impact

Quantify how the US Appeals Court decision voiding the HHS Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) rule shifts Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) benchmarks, patient cost-shares, and provider win probabilities.

Claim Setup
Post-Ruling Statutory Factors (Non-QPA)
Provider Training / Acuity Level
Market Share / Network Power
Teaching / Safety Net Status
Good Faith Contracting Efforts
Arbitration Benchmark Comparison Voided QPA Anchor vs Revised Multi-factor
Patient Cost-Share Cap
$240.00
Provider Post-Ruling Win %
68%
Projected IDR Award
$3,200.00
Insurer Financial Delta
+$2,000.00

IDR Statutory Dispute Brief & Audit Findings

Under the vacated HHS QPA methodology, arbitrator benchmark strictly favored the insurer QPA of $1,200. Following the US Appeals Court ruling, statutory multi-factor evaluation shifts the primary benchmark toward $2,430, elevating provider offer viability. Patient out-of-pocket remains capped by statute based on standard in-network cost-sharing.

IDR Benchmark Outcome: Provider Offer Favored (Post-Ruling Statutory Framework)
Enjoy this tool? Build your own with Super