More compute. Less assumed cost.

The saved calculator enters one hundred forty five billion dollars and six point five gigawatts. Dividing gives about twenty two point three one billion dollars per gigawatt, the displayed unit cost. A hypothetical one gigawatt allocation at that average has twenty two point three one billion, while the full six point five gigawatts has one hundred forty five billion. Bars share three pixels per billion dollars. The input figures are supplied estimates attributed by this source, not independently checked filings, current analyst numbers or a prediction. If the hypothetical capacity doubles from six point five to thirteen gigawatts while capex stays one hundred forty five billion dollars, the quotient halves from about twenty two point three one to eleven point one five billion per gigawatt. Bars share eighteen pixels per billion per gigawatt. This is denominator arithmetic, not proof that doubling compute would really keep construction, power or hardware costs fixed. The supplied roughly half expected claim remains an attribution, not a verified comparison with an invented consensus budget. At the same six point five gigawatts, doubling hypothetical capex from one hundred forty five to two hundred ninety billion doubles the average to forty four point six two billion per gigawatt. Bars share nine pixels per billion per gigawatt. This editable lens has no linked construction, filing or market feed. At zero entered capacity the source readout shows zero but export says not available; neither is a valid ratio. The export preserves the supplied source boundary rather than turning this arithmetic into an investment forecast.