The executable sizing formula multiplies parameter billions by assigned bits per weight and divides by eight, then rounds to one decimal gigabyte. For seventy billion parameters, FP16 gives one hundred forty gigabytes and the source Q4 K M assignment of four point five bits gives thirty-nine point four. Both bars use three pixels per decimal gigabyte. A source comment mentions an overhead factor, but the executable weight expression does not multiply by it. These are written assumptions, not measured model allocations. This source normalizes cache per token by parameter count, not explicit layer and head inputs. At seventy billion, thirty-two thousand seven hundred sixty-eight tokens and batch one, its written formula gives a quarter gigabyte before rounding, displayed as zero point three. Doubling batch gives zero point five. Both bars show those displayed rounded terms at eight hundred pixels per gigabyte. The initial markup and comments mention four gigabytes, but that is not what this executable formula computes. This is a source-specific approximation, not actual KV geometry. Runtime overhead is explicitly weight memory times zero, so it adds nothing. With default Q4 weight thirty-nine point four and rounded cache zero point three, total is thirty-nine point seven gigabytes. A forty-eight gigabyte assigned hardware capacity leaves eight point three. Both bars use ten pixels per gigabyte. Throughput is an assigned bandwidth divided by weights and latency another formula. They are estimates, not current hardware benchmarks or product recommendations.