Research route planner
Test the route before the hardware.
Frame a molecular problem, expose the missing evidence, and leave with a falsifiable experiment plan. This planner never labels a result verified.
Derived planning model
Resource pressure map
Decision impact
Ranked evidence gaps
Durable record
Saved scenarios
How the planning score works
The score combines baseline strength (30%), verification evidence (30%), execution feasibility (25%), and bounded problem pressure (15%). It is a planning heuristic, not scientific evidence. Missing hardware or validation capacity can cap the route even when a problem is difficult.
Planning readiness is not validation
Read the explanation
The source pressure is atom count times point three six plus active orbitals times point six two, rounded and capped at one hundred. Calibration eighteen atoms and fourteen orbitals gives fifteen. Hybrid thirty four atoms and twenty six orbitals gives twenty eight. These bars show fifteen and twenty eight pressure points. The abstract map is not a molecular structure or scientific result. Calibration feasibility rounds hardware forty eight times point four, budget fifty five times point three five, and noise forty five times point two five to fifty. Readiness then rounds baseline forty eight times point three, evidence fifty two times point three, feasibility fifty times point two five, and pressure fifteen times point one five to forty five. The hybrid sample gives seventy four readiness. These are planning scores, not validated probabilities or quantum advantage. A hardware value below thirty, budget below thirty or evidence below thirty five triggers a hard gate. These bars compare the calibration evidence fifty two with hard edge evidence twenty. The low evidence fails a prerequisite even if other terms increase. Saved scenarios retain up to eight local entries; reset restores active calibration while saved records remain. JSON includes all inputs and derived results with a planning only boundary.
Planning support, not a scientific finding
A useful route is one that can fail clearly.
No energy prediction, speedup estimate, hardware access, molecule-safety judgment, or claim of quantum advantage is produced here. Independent baselines and falsification criteria remain mandatory.